Trump, RNC Win Round Against NAACP Over Election Result Challenges
by: Joel B. Pollak | Publieshed: April 03, 2022
Former President Donald Trump, his campaign, and the Republican National Committee won a round on Friday in federal court against the NAACP and associated plaintiffs, who sued over Trump’s efforts to challenge the vote count in several states.
The lawsuit took aim at Republican attempts to challenge vote counts in several states and metropolitan areas where Democrats had turned out their own voters in droves. The plaintiffs alleged that Trump’s challenges “sought to overturn the result of the election by disenfranchising voters, in particular voters of color in several major metropolitan areas.”
Then-candidate Joe Biden boasted in 2020 that he had hired hundreds of lawyers to mount challenges in the event Trump won the election. Moreover, Democrats concentrated their turnout efforts in states with large urban populations. And Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg and his wife spent hundreds of millions of dollars to turn out voters in Democrat-heavy counties in key states. Mass vote-by-mail also attracted close scrutiny in states where it was attempted for the first time.
But the lawsuit portrayed GOP challenges as an effort to disenfranchise black voters in particular, in violation of the Voting Right Act and the Ku Klux Klan Act. The latter was passed after the Civil War to stop efforts to disenfranchise black voters.
“Defendants’ efforts to disenfranchise hundreds of thousands of voters—targeting cities with large Black populations, including Detroit, Michigan, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, and Atlanta, Georgia—repeat the worst abuses in our nation’s history, where Black Americans were denied a voice in American democracy for most of the first two centuries of the Republic,” the lawsuit claimed.
The judge in the lawsuit was Emmet Sullivan, the same judge who presided over the trial of former National Security Advisor Michael Flynn, and who was perceived by many observers to have a bias against President Trump in that case.
The Law & Crime blog reported:
The case was closely-watched, because it could have damaged future Republican efforts to monitor elections in Democrat-heavy areas, where Zuckerberg and other activists have concentrated their efforts, raising suspicions about ballot integrity.
Tags: Date-2022-04-03, AmericanElection2020, Law-Case
This page may have a talk page?.
Access and use of this site by any means implies consent to the Agreement of Use. © Hellene Sun