Library /

1985 Ernst Zundel Trial Transcript

Five thousand and twenty eight pages from a court of law where the Yiddish B’nai B’rith, an affiliate of the ADL, with their millions of dollars, lawyers, and generations of social programming could not prove the Holocaust.

I have looked for this on and off for many hours for 2, maybe more, years. I finally found it on reddit after I had an intuition too look for it once again. It is extremely hard to find and not widely distributed.

Spread far and wide. If the Holohoax was fact as stated then it would have been simple to prove so in a court of law. There is not a simpler argument to disprove the Holohoax.

To show the banality and absurdity of the ZOG prosecution of the late Mr.Zundel here is the charges quoted:

"THE CLERK OF THE PEACE:
ERNST ZUNDEL,
you stand charged that you did, during the year 1981, at the Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto in the Judicial District of York, did publish a statement or tale that you know is false, namely the article, "The West, War and Islam", and the said article is likely to cause mischief to the public interest in social and racial tolerance, contrary to the Criminal Code.
(2)

You stand further charged that you did, in or about the year 1981 at the Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto in the Judicial District of York, did publish a statement or tale, namely, "Did Six Million Really Die?", that you know is false and that is likely to cause mischief to the public interest in social and racial tolerance, contrary to the Criminal Code.
THE COURT:
You can be seated, sir."

How can a court de jure claim that what someone thinks or publish is false? Without forgery if someone publishes something they "know to be false" it is not illegal and determining the intention in the charge is not proper legal procedure. One may publish something they know is false to provide a reference and/or contrast to what they know, or have published, to be the truth. This is not the case here yet it is none of the court' s business whether Mr.Zundel knows what he published is false or not.

Both charges are subjective and open to interpretation. How is the Yiddish Lying of the Holohoax condusive to social and racial tolerance, by harrassing, prosecuting, the truth while protecting the Lie? It is the court in this instance that is guilty of what they charged Mr.Zundel with.

Download: 1985 Ernst Zuendel Trial Transcript (.pdf)

Related:

The Leuchter Report by Fred Leuchter as presented to the Court in this trial.
Mr. Death The Rise and Fall of Fred A. Leuchter Jr., a documentary about Fred Leuchter.

Tags: Canada, Law-Trial, Holohoax, ZOG, YiddishWhining, YiddishLying, YiddishPsychopathy, History

For information on the various file formats in this section visit the Info/File Formats page.

This page may have a talk page ?.